Trouble in the Dales as holiday homes become the new buy-to-let
07-11-2017
Peacock is closely watching developments in St Ives, Cornwall,regarded as the frontline in the battle over second homes. Following a poll supported by 83% of local residents, St Ives banned outsiders from buying newly built homes in the area. A legal challenge by property developers was fought off, and several other Cornish villages are now seeking to impose similar bans.
At Second Estates, Malins says: “The number of second homes in the UK is just 1% of the overall housing stock. There are certain areas such as St Ives which are putting limits on new homes sold to second home buyers – and that’s entirely fair. What we are doing is making sure that our properties are filled with holidaymakers and therefore they have a positive impact on local businesses and jobs.”
Mortgage brokers say that the take-up of loans for holiday lets is increasing fast, albeit from a low base. Interest rates charged are also generally higher than on standard buy-to-let loans.
Leeds building society is the biggest lender in the holiday let market. It says: “Since we launched our holiday let range in July 2013 we have seen a year-on-year increase in demand. Rental yields can be significantly higher when compared with buy-to-let, but location is very important, the cost to purchase may be high and there are some additional costs that you wouldn’t get with a buy-to-let – for example, a weekly cleaner, loo rolls and, potentially, managing agents’ fees.”
Leeds charges 2.59% interest on its two-year fixed holiday let mortgage, rising to 3.3% on its five-year deal, plus a £999 product fee. That compares with the 1.54% for the current lowest rates on buy-to-let two-year fixes, and 2.29% on five-year deals.
Anyone buying a holiday let also has to put down a hefty deposit of at least 30% of the purchase value of the home. Leeds will also want proof that the holiday rental income will be equal to at least 140% of the interest payable on the mortgage, and you will have to prove that you can afford the loan even if the interest rate rises to 5.5%.
If someone was to take out a £200,000 holiday home loan from Leeds BS, its criteria suggest that the borrower would have to achieve an annual rental income of more than £15,000 a year to have any chance of obtaining a loan.
David Hollingworth of mortgage broker London & Country says other lenders granting holiday let loans include Principality building society, which has rates starting at 2.2%, Furness building society and Monmouthshire.
Most buy-to-let lenders won’t consider holiday lets, he says, because they require that the property is let on an assured shorthold tenancy of between six and 12 months, which clearly doesn’t work for holiday lets. He adds that lenders will also want to ensure that the home is a standard property, so will not consider those in holiday parks.
“We’ve seen quite a big increase in holiday home mortgages, but from a low level,” says Ray Boulger of broker John Charcol. “The financial situation has changed significantly in favour of this type of property in the past year, and if you are prepared to put in the extra work it requires, then holiday lets are clearly more attractive than buy-to-lets.”
To qualify for all the tax advantages, holiday home owners must follow a number of rules. HM Revenue & Customs says the property must be available for letting for at least 210 days in the year, and be let for at least 105 days. But unlike conventional buy-to-lets, an investor in a holiday home can also use it for their own holidays for as much as 20 weeks a year.
Leaping through tax loopholes
A legal loophole means that holiday home owners avoid paying both council tax and business rates, depriving local authorities of much-needed cash.
A furnished holiday home let for at least 140 days a year is regarded as a business, so there is no council tax to pay. But owners are also entitled to 100% relief on business rates if the property has a rateable value of less than £12,000. Consultants Colliers International analysed the potential rate bill of 7,300 holiday homes in Cornwall and found that more than 7,150 of those second home owners had properties with a rateable value of less than £12,000, so were paying no business rates.
Colliers calculates that the loophole means holiday home owners are subsidised in Cornwall alone by about £13.2m (if they were forced to pay business rates) or £14.6m (if they were required to pay council tax).
John Webber, head of rating at Colliers, said: “It’s a scandal that those who have holiday homes and rent them out are able to take advantage of the small business rates relief and so pay less tax, putting the burden of the rates bill on to other businesses who are struggling to pay their bills.
“We do not criticise second home owners who take advantage of this tax break – that could be considered sensible tax planning. But we do criticise that the government has allowed this situation to happen and has ignored the rating industry’s calls for root-and-branch reform of the business rates system.”
Since you’re here …
… we have a small favour to ask. More people are reading the Guardian than ever but advertising revenues across the media are falling fast. And unlike many news organisations, we haven’t put up a paywall – we want to keep our journalism as open as we can. So you can see why we need to ask for your help. The Guardian’s independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our perspective matters – because it might well be your perspective, too.
I appreciate there not being a paywall: it is more democratic for the media to be available for all and not a commodity to be purchased by a few. I’m happy to make a contribution so others with less means still have access to information. Thomasine F-R.
If everyone who reads our reporting, who likes it, helps to support it, our future would be much more secure.